For Project & PMC Teams

Stop Chasing Vendor Inputs Across Documents

Align vendor scope early, capture risks at source, and reduce cost overruns and delays during project execution.

Poorly aligned vendor inputs during RFPs are a primary driver of execution risk — Kontrad addresses this upstream.

Project-based engagement. No IT integration required.
Evaluation Matrix (Comparison View)
Click to explore the comparison

Evaluation Matrix

Solar PV Project — Vendor ComparisonIn progress3 documents3 vendors
ExportBack to Review
Filter by risk level:
Legend:High riskMedium riskLow riskNo issues
Document
Vendor A
Vendor B
Vendor C
Part A — Project Descriptionv29
Low Risk

Minor procedural clarification needed

1 itemsScore 2.5
High Risk

Seeks to modify mandatory requirements

2 itemsScore 4
No issues identified
Part B — Technical Scopev18
High Risk

Weakens performance guarantees

3 itemsScore 4.2
Medium Risk

Proposes liability limitations

3 itemsScore 3.3
Medium Risk

Seeks scope clarifications

3 itemsScore 2.8
Part C — Schedule of Pricev12
Medium Risk

Requests shorter payment terms

2 itemsScore 3.1
Low Risk

Minor milestone adjustments

1 itemsScore 1.8
Medium Risk

Requests advance payment

3 itemsScore 3.5

Kontrad is a controlled review environment that helps project teams align vendor inputs, identify deviations early, and produce decision-ready outputs before contract award.

Problem

Where execution risk starts — before project kick-off

The decisions made during vendor review determine the quality of execution. Most teams are making them without adequate visibility.

Late visibility of vendor deviations

Risk items are buried in documents and only surfaced reactively — long after key decisions have been made and scope has been locked in.

Fragmented inputs across email, Excel, and markups

Review feedback is scattered across parallel channels with no consolidated thread, making it impossible to track what was agreed and by whom.

Weak traceability of decisions

When issues arise during execution, there is no auditable record showing who reviewed what, when, and on what basis decisions were made.

Manual reconciliation delays the review cycle

Teams spend days consolidating submissions before review can begin — compressing the time available for substantive risk assessment.

Misalignment carried into the execution phase

Unresolved scope ambiguities and unchallenged vendor assumptions from the RFP phase become change orders and disputes during delivery.

Margin erosion due to unclear scope

Vendors submit on favourable assumptions. Without clause-level scrutiny, scope gaps are not caught until they are priced into variations.

These issues do not stay in procurement — they materialise during execution.

How exposed is your review process?

Identify coordination gaps and risk exposure in minutes.

Confidential • No commitment

How It Works

From submission to controlled review in four steps

Replace fragmented coordination with a repeatable, auditable process that captures risk at source.

01

Structure requirements

Start with your own Word or Excel specifications. Kontrad structures the clauses and requirements automatically for review.

02

Collect vendor responses

Vendors respond within the same structured framework, eliminating formatting inconsistencies.

03

Compare submissions clause-by-clause

Automated risk and compliance scoring surfaces gaps, deviations, and non-conformances instantly.

04

Generate executive summaries

Generate compliance summaries and risk assessments ready for executive review and stakeholder sign-off.

Powered by Kontrad's Word Add-in, Collaboration Matrix, and Evaluation Matrix

Product Walkthrough

See How Teams Align Vendor Scope and Capture Risks Early

A short walkthrough of how project teams use Kontrad to coordinate multi-vendor reviews, surface deviations early, and produce decision-ready outputs.

No login required. Watch on YouTube

Collaboration Matrix

Managing Multiple Vendors on a Critical Project?

Review vendor submissions inside Microsoft Word, capture deviations at source, then coordinate and compare across all vendors in Kontrad’s Collaboration Matrix — before risks carry into execution.

Kontrad product workflow showing the Microsoft Word document, Word Add-in with Risk Summary sidebar, and Collaboration Matrix dashboard for multi-vendor comparison
Click to expand
Review in WordIdentify RisksCompare Vendors

Supporting Reviews for Major Infrastructure, Energy and Engineering Projects

Including engagements with leading operators, developers, and engineering teams

Energy infrastructure project
Energy

Multi-vendor technical submissions and contract scope reviews

Major civil infrastructure project
Infrastructure

Complex RFP clarifications and consortium coordination

Large-scale engineering project
Engineering

Internal SME alignment and audit-ready decision tracking

“Kontrad is well placed to bring significant value and clarity to procurement negotiations.”

— James, Contracts & Commercial, MRICS, MCIArb, ADPIC

Examples include project engagements, testing, and evaluation work.

Why Kontrad

Where Review Cycles Slow Down — and How They Change

Example: Infrastructure project with 5 bidders and 25–30 clarifications per vendor

Includes pre-qualification responses and vendor clarification queries

Typical review workflow

Consolidating clarifications

Legacy

2–14 days

Kontrad

Immediate

Surfacing key issues

Legacy

1–5 days

Kontrad

Immediate

Coordinating internal SMEs

Legacy

3–5 days

Kontrad

Direct SME access

Audit & reporting

Legacy

2–3 days

Kontrad

Instant export

Typical impact: 30–50% faster review cycles, with full traceability across all inputs.

Measured during pilot using real project data.

Deployment

Deploy Without Disrupting Your Project Environment

Kontrad is designed to slot into your current workflows. No migration required.

No replacement of Aconex or SharePoint

Kontrad works alongside your existing document management systems, not instead of them.

No IT integration required for pilot

Get started on a single project without IT tickets, procurement cycles, or infrastructure changes.

Compatible with structured submission workflows

Designed to fit into your existing technical submission and evaluation processes out of the box.

Secure data environment

Enterprise-grade encryption, access controls, and audit logging from day one.

API available for enterprise portfolio scaling

When you are ready to scale across projects, our API supports portfolio-wide integration and reporting.

Multi-project portfolio oversight

Kontrad provides structured reporting that scales from single project reviews to multi-project portfolio oversight.

Get Started

Start with a Structured Engagement on a Live Project

Run a controlled review on a live project to align scope, capture risks early, and reduce execution uncertainty.

Starter Bundle

Best for validating Kontrad on 1–2 live vendor review cycles

What's Included

  • Setup on 1–2 live RFPs or contract review packages
  • Configuration of review structure, roles, and comparison logic
  • Alignment of evaluation criteria and decision workflows
  • Access for your core project team and external participants
  • Guided onboarding and working sessions
  • Support with document upload and setup
  • Executive summary and rollout recommendations

Example Outcomes Tracked

Focus: reducing execution risk before contract award

KPIs are defined at the start of the engagement and aligned to your project priorities.

  • ≥50% faster review consolidation
  • 30–40% faster decision memo preparation
  • ≥70% of interactions handled in-app (vs email/Excel)
  • 100% time-stamped and exportable audit trail

Baseline metrics are captured during onboarding to measure improvement objectively.

Fixed-price, project-based engagement, defined around your objectives

No IT integration required. Runs alongside your existing tools.

Delivered remotely or on-site depending on project needs.

See How It Works on a Live Project

Align vendor scope, capture risks early, and reduce execution uncertainty — on a live project.

See how Kontrad fits into your current review and procurement workflow.

Get Started

Prefer to share your project details?

Tell us about your current vendor review or coordination challenge — we'll follow up with relevant examples and next steps.

No meeting required. We'll review your input and follow up directly.